<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: this week&#8217;s newsletter</title>
	<link>http://blog.buongiornovenezia.com/2007/07/23/this-weeks-newsletter-10/</link>
	<description>Dialogue with the readers of the newsletter Buongiorno Venezia</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Kjell Magne Maelen</title>
		<link>http://blog.buongiornovenezia.com/2007/07/23/this-weeks-newsletter-10/#comment-1615</link>
		<author>Kjell Magne Maelen</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.buongiornovenezia.com/2007/07/23/this-weeks-newsletter-10/#comment-1615</guid>
					<description>Tourist tax and entrance fee.
As to the Government proposal for a new tourist tax for Italian art towns and the AVA's (Association Venetian Hoteliers) decision against it, I would like to comment that a tax or fee of some kind seem to be needed to cover the costs of the continuous and various tearing and wearing down of Venice. I would however like to say that as far as my experiences as a tourist go a (small) tax will not reduce the number of tourists coming to Venice if that was the aim of the taxation or fee. A tax or fee would merely function as a support to the countinous maintaining of the city's infrastructures. Hence, I would recommend that one should utilize an established collection system through which the needed infrastructure organisations normally get funding for their business operations. An example is the 6 Euro ticket price on a vaporetto ticket unless you have a Carta Venezia. It could easily be lifted even more. I also seem to remember that the Venice mayor suggested an increased property tax on properties used to tourist accomodation. That is also an instrument I would support. The reason why the hoteliers can charge the high prices they do to day, is mainly a consequence of a continously increasing market. A small increase in tax on their properties will not scare any tourists away or just regulate their profits. But it will have a positive effect on the city's finances. 

If the hoteliers are afraid of the money being lost in governmental bureaucracy I would direct the attention to the taxation system of San Francisco, California where a tax on hotel accomodation is directed into a fund for arts and culture run and administered by a board with members from all walks of life in the tourist industry including the hoteliers.

Kind regards
Kjell Magne Maelen (Norwegian)
p.t. with address in Cannaregio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tourist tax and entrance fee.<br />
As to the Government proposal for a new tourist tax for Italian art towns and the AVA&#8217;s (Association Venetian Hoteliers) decision against it, I would like to comment that a tax or fee of some kind seem to be needed to cover the costs of the continuous and various tearing and wearing down of Venice. I would however like to say that as far as my experiences as a tourist go a (small) tax will not reduce the number of tourists coming to Venice if that was the aim of the taxation or fee. A tax or fee would merely function as a support to the countinous maintaining of the city&#8217;s infrastructures. Hence, I would recommend that one should utilize an established collection system through which the needed infrastructure organisations normally get funding for their business operations. An example is the 6 Euro ticket price on a vaporetto ticket unless you have a Carta Venezia. It could easily be lifted even more. I also seem to remember that the Venice mayor suggested an increased property tax on properties used to tourist accomodation. That is also an instrument I would support. The reason why the hoteliers can charge the high prices they do to day, is mainly a consequence of a continously increasing market. A small increase in tax on their properties will not scare any tourists away or just regulate their profits. But it will have a positive effect on the city&#8217;s finances. </p>
<p>If the hoteliers are afraid of the money being lost in governmental bureaucracy I would direct the attention to the taxation system of San Francisco, California where a tax on hotel accomodation is directed into a fund for arts and culture run and administered by a board with members from all walks of life in the tourist industry including the hoteliers.</p>
<p>Kind regards<br />
Kjell Magne Maelen (Norwegian)<br />
p.t. with address in Cannaregio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabian Babich</title>
		<link>http://blog.buongiornovenezia.com/2007/07/23/this-weeks-newsletter-10/#comment-1918</link>
		<author>Fabian Babich</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.buongiornovenezia.com/2007/07/23/this-weeks-newsletter-10/#comment-1918</guid>
					<description>Your Nov 27 Newsletter reports that "on Tuesday, 20 November, a 24-year-old Venetian man attempted suicide by jumping from the Rialto Bridge." Il Ponte Rialto is truly an elegant venue, but hardly an effective choice from which to suicide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Nov 27 Newsletter reports that &#8220;on Tuesday, 20 November, a 24-year-old Venetian man attempted suicide by jumping from the Rialto Bridge.&#8221; Il Ponte Rialto is truly an elegant venue, but hardly an effective choice from which to suicide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

